Dudabhai vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. Mr.J. R. Dave, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application, at this stage, reserving liberty of the applicant to move for bail in future. Request, as prayed for, is granted.2. The instant application stands disposed of as withdrawn, at this stage, reserving li...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sureshchandra vs Meetaben
Judges:
19 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Mr.Sojitra, learned counsel for the appellant states that towards probable cost of the respondent, the appellant will deposit the amount of Rs.10,000/- before this Court on or before 02.07.2012. S.O. to 03.07.2012.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (C.L.SONI, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhoraji vs Bharatkumar
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Heard Mr.Premal R. Joshi, learned advocate for the petitioner.Issue Notice, returnable on 16.07.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Girishkumar vs Subhashchandra
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Both the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties have jointly made a request for adjournment. Request is granted. Matter is fixed for hearing on 21st June 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J.) Deepak* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Induben vs Appearance :
Judges:
19 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The basis of the present petition is the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 06.09.2010 in Special Civil Application No.5254/05, whereby the direction was given to pay the gratuity and pension.Upon hearing the learned counsel appear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raysingbhai vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Rule.Mr.K.L.Pandya, learned APP appears and waives service of Rule for respondent - State.This application is filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with complaint being M.Case No.1 of 2012 registered with Sanjeli Police Station, District: D...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantaben vs Fatehsinh
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. No one appears for opponent No. 3.2. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the Act) arises out of M.A.C.P. No. 1354 of 1991 in which the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gandhinagar awarded the compensation to the claimants of Rs. 1,27,597 being 80 per cent of n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dipakbhai vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·At the request made on behalf of learned Advocate Mr. Viral K. Shah for the Applicants, the matter is adjourned with the consent of learned Advocate Mr.Hardik A.Dave for Respondent No.2.S.O.to 12th July, 2012. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Akram vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Mr.Singh, learned advocate for the applicant, upon instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present application reserving the liberty of the present applicant to move for bail before appropriate Court after charge-sheet is filed.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application sta...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.