Appearance vs Learned
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Learned counsel Mr. Munshaw appearing for respondent No.2 states that the order has been complied with. Learned counsel Ms. Shah for the petitioner confirms the same.Under the circumstances, the cause of the petitioner would not survive. Disposed of accordi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Workmen
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Matter was called out twice. On both the occasions, none has remained present for the petitioner. Special Civil Application is dismissed for default. Rule discharged. No costs.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) After the aforesaid order was passed but before it was signed, learned advocate Shri Japee appeared and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Comissioner vs Priya
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) By this petition, the petitioner, Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) seeks stay of order no.511/02-B dated 19.12.2002 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal no.C/165/02-B whereby the Tribunal has allowed the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surat vs Mohamadusman
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Land of the respondent situated at Baranpuri Bhagal in Ward No.12 Entry Nos.1 to 5 was acquired by the appellant Corporation and an award was passed by the appellant Corporation under Sec.216 of BPMC Act offering compensation @ Rs.12,603/- per sq.mtr. totalling to Rs.4,00,432=59. Though the award wa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshkumar vs Dinesh
Judges:
20 June, 2012·By order dated 13.06.2012 this Court had issued notice and stayed the impugned order till today i.e. 20.06.2012, however, due to inadvertence, the matter is not listed today and, therefore, the learned advocate for the petitioner mentioned before this Court as the stay is limited till today.Matter t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kasim vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard Ms. Mishra, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE.Ms. Shruti Pathak, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct Service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim as pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hasmukh vs Aksar
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Request is being made by the learned advocate Shri Jitendra N. Patel that the heirs of the respondent no. 8 are already on the record of this writ petition as respondent nos. 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 and no more heirs are now required to be added and the request made by him for impleading the heirs of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amad vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr.H.K. Patel wants some more time to obtain detailed instructions, if required, by recording statement of Talati-cum-Mantri of the concerned authority. At his request the matter is adjourned to 25th June 2012.(RAVI ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Ms
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted. This application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.[ Z. K. SAIYED, J. ] (vijay) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Official
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Mr.Devang D. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that through inadvertence the annexure to the additional affidavit in support of Judges' Summons dated 27.02.2012 has not been filed, therefore, he may be permitted to place the same on record. Permission to do so is granted.Mr.J.D. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.