Union Of India & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Cause is similar in all these petitions. Brief facts for the limited purpose of this judgement may be noticed from Special Civil Application No.13295 of 2004. In the said petition, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 25.5.2004 passed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of India & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Cause is similar in all these petitions. Brief facts for the limited purpose of this judgement may be noticed from Special Civil Application No.13295 of 2004. In the said petition, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 25.5.2004 passed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of India & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Cause is similar in all these petitions. Brief facts for the limited purpose of this judgement may be noticed from Special Civil Application No.13295 of 2004. In the said petition, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 25.5.2004 passed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of India & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Cause is similar in all these petitions. Brief facts for the limited purpose of this judgement may be noticed from Special Civil Application No.13295 of 2004. In the said petition, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 25.5.2004 passed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive Engineer
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
20 June, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. Though served, none appears for respondents.2. The petitioner-original employer in Reference No. 385 of 1999 has approached this Court with following reliefs:i) “that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;ii) that the Hon...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahendrabhai vs Municipal
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Mr.M.V.Patel for H.L.Patel Advocates shall file Affidavit-in-Reply of opponent No. 2 by next date of hearing i.e. 3.7.2012. If no Affidavit-in-Reply is filed, respondent No.2 shall remain personally present.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Nitinbhai
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in present petition, the order passed by the learned Tribunal (MACT) is challenged.Therefore, the office is directed to take necessary steps to place the matter before the Court where the matters arising from the learned Tribunal's order are assi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jha vs Baba
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Vaishnav, learned counsel for the petitioner. None present on behalf of the respondents even in the third call. Hence, RULE.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs M. Sahai Sd/
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing with Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt for the appellant - revenue on the proposed question of law which is as under :-"Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in reversing the ord...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nagindas vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Communication dated 28.03.2012 addressed by the District Development Officer is taken on record. In view of the said communication, it appears that the grievances of the petitioner are met with as the benefits as prayed for have been granted. This petition, therefore, does not survive and is require...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.