Govindji vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Kodekar, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent State.1. The instant application is filed seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with Dehgam Police Station, C.R. No. I-41/2012 for the offences punishable under Sections ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Batwa vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Rule.On the issue of interim relief, this Court is of the opinion that if the same is granted at this stage, then it would amount to allowing the petition without adjudication.If the petitioner-Union, ultimately, succeeds in the present proceedings, then its members would get the difference of salar...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirajlal vs Chandubhai
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant-original plaintiff-party-in-person to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 30/03/2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Anand in Civil Suit No. 32/2001 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dharamshibhai vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·It appears that the notice issued to respondent no. 2 has not returned back. Hence, issue fresh notice to respondent no. 2 returnable on 25th July, 2012. Direct service is permitted.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J) *asma Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tensile vs New
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Leave to amend the date of impugned notice.NOTICE returnable on 29.6.2012. Ad-interim relief in terms of Para 10(B) till then. Direct service is permitted.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bank vs Gopalbhai
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Chudgar for M/s Nanavati Associates for the petitioner. None is present for respondent workman.The petitioner, opponent in Recovery(Central) Application (Old) No. 1 of 1981, and new No. 347 of 1982 in the Labour Court, Ahmedabad, filed by respondent workman under section 33-C(2) of the I.D...
High Court Of Gujarat
Uma vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to keep 4 (four) subjects in Standard XI.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is a handicapped student studying in Standard XI of Rajasthan Hindi High School, Ahmedabad. It is the case o...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Madhuriben
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.In view of explanation rendered in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application on oath sufficient cause is shown in filing appeal and accordingly prayer in terms of para 4(A) is granted.Civil Application stands allowed and is disposed of accordingly. Rule is made ab...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shamlaji vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Popat, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE. Ms.Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim as pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Trivedi, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE. Mr.Rashesh Rindani, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim as...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.