Ruparel vs M. Sahai
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Mr.Amit Laddha, holding brief of Mr.H.P.Modh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that he has instructions that his client wants to withdraw this Appeal and does not want to press this Appeal, to which learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasantrai vs District
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Clerk in District Panchayat, Kutch on 01.11.1966. He was promoted as Senior Clerk on 21.01.1982. He was working in the Administrative Wing of the respondent Panchayat and retired from the post of Senior Clerk on 30.09.2000 on attaining the age of superannuat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogeshkumar vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. The petitioner, herein, has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 2/4.12.2010 rejecting the application of the petitioner and to direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner on compassionate ground.2. The father of the petitioner, who was working with the respondent, died ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Asia vs Federation
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Learned Counsel Mr.S. A. Mehta for the appellant states that he has instructions not to press this appeal, therefore, the matter is not required to be proceeded further. Considering the statement made by learned advocate for the appellant, the appeal stands...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dineshkumar vs Vadodara
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Registry to verify whether the matter pertains to service-labour laws and, after verifying the same, place the same before the appropriate Court after obtaining the necessary orders from the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Land vs Sarvanbhai
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.K.M.Sheth submits that he has instructions to appear for respondents.Heard learned advocates for the parties.Considering the averments made in the application, this application is allowed in terms of paragraph 6(B). Amendment be carried out forthwith. Rule is made absolute.( M.D....
High Court Of Gujarat
Kiransinh vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Kodekar, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent State.1. The instant application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in connection with C.R. No. III-106/2012 registered with Godhra Taluka Police Station, for the offences punis...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imtiyazhussain vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·IMTIYAZHUSSAIN SAIYEDMOHAMMAD SAIYED - Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR LR PATHAN for Applicant(s) : 1, MR RC KODEKAR, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= COR...
High Court Of Gujarat
Apple vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH)1. This Special Civil Application has been filed by the petitioner on 20.1.2012 challenging the order dated 17.1.2012 passed by respondent No.2 whereby the technical bid submitted by the petitioner has been rejected. It is averred by the petitioner that he has b...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Though
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. Though served, but nobody is appeared on behalf of the respondents. Therefore, the Appeal is taken up for final hearing on today.2. The present appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.1.1997 passed by the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.