Prashant vs Jethabhai
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.Considering the averments made in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 on oath sufficient cause is shown for the delay in filing the appeal and, therefore, delay of 59 days is condoned and prayer is terms of para 6 (a) and (b) is granted.Rule is made absolute.[ANANT S. DAVE,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajesh vs Bank
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Office to show the name of Nanavati Associates for the respondent.S.O.to 09.07.2012.(K.S.Jhaveri, J.) Amar Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Thakkar vs Rd
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Mr.Tushar Sheth, learned Advocate for the applicant does not press this application. Hence, the application stands disposed of as not pressed.Sd/-(R.M. Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna vs Bank
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Since learned advocate Mr. Parikh is indisposed, he has requested for time. Hence, matter is fixed on 9.7.2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani, J. ) sudhir Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanjaybhai vs Aslambhai
Judges:
25 June, 2012·1. Rule.Learned advocate Mr.Darshan Dave waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.1-original complainant and learned APP Mr. H. L. Jani waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.2-State.2. The present application has been filed by the applicants under Section-482 of the Criminal P...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chetanbhai vs State
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Rule, returnable on 23.07.2012.Direct service is permitted.[K S JHAVERI, J] Ankit* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishal vs Jayantilal
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Draft amendment is permitted. Learned advocate Mr.Ravani appearing for petitioner to produce on record a copy of the application preferred before Collector for which he has requested three days' time period. Time, as prayed for is granted.The matter is adjourned to 28th June, 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghuma vs State
Judges:
25 June, 2012·S.O.to 5.7.2012. Status-quo to continue till then.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya,J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Tecso
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Mr.B.J.Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioner Company, states that a longer period of time may be granted, as a last opportunity, to enable the respondent to make efforts to arrive at a settlement with the petitioner.List on 30.07.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shilu vs State
Judges:
25 June, 2012·Having considered the application forwarded by the applicant-convict through jail and the relevant papers annexed, so also the jail remarks sheet and the grounds on which the competent authority has rejected the application for parole leave of the convict, this Court is of the opinion that no ground...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.