Dineshchandra vs Virchand
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Karia, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Pandya, learned Counsel with Mr. Patel, learned advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Upadhyaya, learned advocate for respondent No.4.2. At the outset it is necessary to mention that consensus has been arrived at between the peti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fatuben vs Mariaben
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Leave to amend.Heard Mr. D.B. Rana, learned advocate for the applicants - original petitioners and Mr. J.H. Kapadia, learned advocate for opponent Nos.3/1 to 3/6, 5, 6, 7, 8/1 and 8/2.Considering the averments made in Paras 2 to 5 of the application, the delay in preferring this application is condo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Lb Dabhi App For
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) 1 By way of the present appeal, appellant - original accused has challenged the judgment and order dated 7.2.2006, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Patan, in Sessions Case No. 31 of 2005, by which he has been convicted f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijaykumar vs Appearance
Judges:
29 June, 2012·On 21.9.2001, this Appeal was admitted and bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.5000/- was issued against the respondent No.1 - original accused by this Court. The said bailable warrant was served to the respondent No.1. Today, when the matter is called out, the respondent No.1 is not present. The Appe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bachiben vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Ms.Shivya Desai, learned Counsel for M/s. R.J. Rawal Associates for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 seeks time to file Affidavit-in-Reply. As a last chance S.O. to 6.7.2012. If the Affidavit is not filed Deputy Estate Officer, East Zone shall remain personally remain present in the Court.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J....
High Court Of Gujarat
Haribhai vs Unknown
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Mr.Manish J. Patel, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application under the Contempt of Courts Act with a liberty to file substantive petition for appropriate direction.Permission as sought for is granted. The applic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs None For
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The petition was not pressed with a view to making appropriate application under Sub-section (3) of Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Accordingly, it is disposed.(D.H.Waghela, J.) (G.B.Shah, J.) *malek Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shri vs The
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Office is directed to call for Record and Proceedings of Sessions Case No.3 of 2006 from the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Porbandar, so as to reach on or before 27th July, 2012.(A.J.DESAI, J.) pnnair Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dolatsinh vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Rule.Learned A.P.P., Ms.A.C. Raval for the respondent no.1-State of Gujarat and learned counsel, Mr.Y.V. Vaghela for the respondent no.2-complainant.The present application has been filed by the applicants-accused under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the FIR being C.R.No....
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhimsibhai vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent no.2 dated 24.07.2007.In light of the observations of the Hon'ble Apex Court in a ju...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.