Commissioner Of Police &
Judges: Md Shah
24 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 29.03.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat
Judges: Z K Saiyed
24 July, 2012·1. The present Appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat against the Judgment and order dated 06.11.1995 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.7, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 159 of 1992, w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Police &
Judges: Md Shah
24 July, 2012·1) Heard learned counsel for the parties.2) This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 22/03/2012 passed by respondent no.1 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the dete...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramanbhai B Patel Huf vs The Dy C I T Assessment Opponents
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
24 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These appeals arise out of a common judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(“the Tribunal” for short) dated 29.2.2000. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. At the time of admission of this appeal common s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramanbhai B Patel Huf vs The Dy C I T Assessment Opponents
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
24 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These appeals arise out of a common judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(“the Tribunal” for short) dated 29.2.2000. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. At the time of admission of this appeal common s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghanshyamsbhai Makanbhai Parmar Opponents
Judges: Z K Saiyed, Z K
24 July, 2012·1. The present appeal, under Section 378(1) (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 23.6.1993 passed by the learned Special Judge (Corruption), Panchmahals at Godhra, in Special Case No.3 of 1989, whereby the accused has been...
High Court Of Gujarat
Metaflux Company Pvt.Ltd vs Ganchi Ibrahim Ismailbhai & 7
Judges:
24 July, 2012·Leave to amend the addresses of unserved respondent Nos.5 to 8. Fresh NOTICE returnable on 13.8.2012. Direct service is permitted. Over and above the Direct Service, the petitioner shall also serve this order additionally by RPAD.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya...
High Court Of Gujarat
Subhashchandra Mulshankar ... vs Principal - Shri Pandya Primary ...
Judges:
24 July, 2012·Rule returnable on 04.09.2012. Mr R.R. Trivedi, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of rule.(K.S. JHAVERI, J.) Divya// HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Thu Jun 30 02:43:53 IST 2016...
High Court Of Gujarat
Badi Huseinbhai Ahmmadbhai ... vs State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges:
24 July, 2012·Heard Mr.Mukul Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner.The matter requires consideration.Hence, Rule returnable on 13.09.2012. Parties to complete their pleadings including the petitioner.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mc Thakar & 3 ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
24 July, 2012·MC THAKAR & 3 Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR SV RAJU for Petitioner(s) : 1 4.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1 2. ========================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Da...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.