Tata vs M
Judges:
04 July, 2012·The applicant has taken out this application for seeking appropriate direction qua their liability to pay 17-B wages to the workman, who has attained the age of superannuation. The applicant kept on paying 17B wages even after one year from the date of superannuation. When it was noticed that the wo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1.00. Mr.Japan Dave, learned advocate has made a statement at the bar that he has instruction to appear on behalf of one Ketan Tirodkar, who is wanted by Central Bureau of Investigation ("CBI" for short) - investigating agency and against whom Summonses are issued by the CBI - investigating agency.2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rasikaben vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1. This petition has been filed seeking issuance of appropriate directions to the respondent to grant appointment to the petitioner on compassionate grounds or to grant monetary benefit as per the new Government Policy dated 05.07.2011.2. The husband of the petitioner was serving as Addl. Assistant ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatkumar vs Kantibhai
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Vijay Nagesh appears for respondents and seeks time. An application is already moved, being Civil Application No. 7462 of 2012 for urgent hearing of breach of order.Learned advocate Mr. Vijay Nagesh waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.Matter is fixed for hearing...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Haidarali
Judges:
04 July, 2012·RULE returnable on 24.7.2012. Mr. K.K. Trivedi, learned advocate waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 2, 3/1, 4, 5 and 6. Direct service is permitted for rest of the respondents.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lataben vs Surendranagar
Judges:
04 July, 2012·The learned advocate on record, who appeared on behalf of respondent no.1, has expired. Hence, Notice to respondent no.1, returnable on 30.08.2012.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalu vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 13.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1)/3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short "the Act") by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Served By Affix.-(R) For ... vs 3
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1 Applicant-Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation has filed this Civil Application for condonation of delay of 553 days in filing First Appeal against the judgment and award dated 28.2.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Court No.6, Ahmedabad, in MACP No.362 of 1990.2 In thi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs M. Sahai Sd/
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the revenue.2. These five Tax Appeals have been filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Pragji
Judges:
04 July, 2012·[1] Mr.P.P.Banaji, learned AGP appears and waives service of rule for respondent no.3.[2] Present application has been filed by the applicant permitting the applicant to be joined as party respondent in First Appeal.[2] Having heard learned advocate for the appellants and considering the averments m...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.