Jama vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Mr.Kharadi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to amend the cause-title and delete Bombay Land Revenue Code, as the matter pertains to Wakf Act.Hence, the Registry is directed to examine the same and place the matter before the appropriate Bench after obtaining necessary o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chitvan vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Learned A.G.P. has tendered affidavit. Copy has been served to the learned Advocate for the petitioners.Learned Advocate for the petitioners has requested for time to take instruction of his client in connection with the details mentioned in the reply affidavit. S.O. to 23rd July 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Learned Advocate Mr.Lakhani Has
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule returnable today. Learned Advocate Mr.Lakhani has, at the suggestion of the court, accepted a copy of the petition and has waived service of rule on behalf of the respondents.The petitioner has claimed promotion to the post of Traffic Controller. It is the claim of the petitioner that the petit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Shri M.J.Buddhabhatti
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Blissful ignorance of the law declared by this court in its rulings in the case of STATE OF GUJARAT v. BUTASING INDRASING reported in 1990 (1) 31 (1) Gujarat Law Reporter at page 26, in the case of STATE OF GUJARAT v. GULAMNABI reported in 1990 (1) 31 (1) Gujarat Law Reporter at page 60 and in the c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maulik vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. Draft amendment granted.2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow the present Special Civil Application.(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the decision by respondent no.1 vide no. Aa-ra-j...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Ad Padival For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·According to the applicant unit, this chemical unit of Nandesari Industrial Estate is not engaged in the production and manufacture of any of the specified items and its discharge of effluent is less than 25,000 ltrs. per day.It is their further case that it has established satisfactory primary and ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayuddin vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. By filing present petition the petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 16.05.2011 passed, against the petitioner, by the respondent No.2 in exercise of power under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhartiba vs Mohan
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have inter alia challenged order dated 20.10.2011 passed by the Secretary, Revenue Department, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No.MVV/HKP/RJT/100/2011.2. Heard Mr.Majmudar, learned counsel appearing for the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajiv vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) The applicants are the appellants of Criminal Appeal No. 1126/2007, which is admitted by this Court vide order dated 31.8.2002. The applicants are convicted for the offences under section 176 and 177 of IPC and are sentenced to S/I for one month and thre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Haraji vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Pursuant to the order dated 9.7.2012, Mr Kishorbhai Vishnubhai Savant, Head Constable, is present before this Court. He reports that PSI Mr G.N. Nandaniya has fallen sick and is likely to resume duty on 23.7.2012. The officer present shall communicate to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.