Appearance: vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·"The remaining amount which is complained of by the applicants relate to deduction under the I.T.Act. on this regard the attention of the court is drawn to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in judgement Today IT 1996 (3) SC 76. In view of this development, learned A.G.P.. Seeks time to get the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·"Mr. A.J.Patel, ld. Advocate representing the petitioners submits that exemption under Section 20, sub-section (1) of U.L.C. Act is still in operation and therefore he withdraws the petition. It therefore accordingly stands disposed of. Interim relief stands vacated. Rule is discharged"....
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Oral Order
Judges:
16 July, 2012·"Heard Mr. S.V.Parmar, ld.Advocate for the petitioner. By the impunged order the Additional Development Commissioner has granted interim injunction in favour of Respondent No.1. The Appeal is pending and inspite of the fact that there is a pending defence that might not have locus-standi he is being...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Served By Ds For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The Additional Commissioner, State of Gujarat, Gandhinnagar, being the Appellate Authority, is hereby directed to decide the petitioner's Appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this direction. It is expected that such Appeal is decided after hearing the petitioner a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Liberty To The Petitioner To Give
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Liberty to the petitioner to give representation to the respondent-corporation in respect of the harassment alleged by the petitioner. However, this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be entertained. When such a question of fact which is on the face of it disputed is raised....
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·"Mr. A.J. Patel, Ld. advocate representing the petitioners submits that exemption under Section 20, sub section (1) of U.L.C. Act, is still in operation and therefore he withdraws the petition. It, therefore accordingly stands disposed of. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated....
High Court Of Gujarat
Civil Application No. 5761 Of 1996 vs Mr Pc Kavina For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Mr.Kavina has filed the affidavit-in-reply today. The same be taken on record. Mr.S.I.Nanavati, therefore, seeks time. Time granted. S.O. to 3.10.1996.sd.D.G.Karia,J....
High Court Of Gujarat
Jal vs Kaira
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Learned advocate appearing for the applicant does not press this application. The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly as not pressed.(M.D. SHAH, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Unknown
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1.This appeal was fixed for final hearing with the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the parties on 28.11.1995. During the course of hearing this court found that it would be just and proper and equitable to summon Dr.V.R.Patel with further direction to PI, Naroda Police Station to rema...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Petitioner - Original
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Petitioner - original defendant no. 2 Shri Shasanadhikari Saheb, Nagar Prathmik Shikshan Samiti, Jetpur, has moved this court under S.115 of the C.P.Code challenging the judgment and order dated 31.7.1996, passed by the learned 3rd Extra Assistant Judge, Gondal,in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 36 of 1996, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.