State vs Arjanbhai
Judges:
19 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Rule returnable on 30th July, 2012.Direct service is permitted.(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (ashish) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinsinh vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·This application is filed by the applicant, who is original accused No.5 in the FIR and accused No.2 in the chargesheet seeking regular bail u/s.439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Panchkoshi 'B' Division police station, Jamnagar C.R.No.I-53 of 2012 pertaining to the offences punishable u/ss.143, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahendra vs Punjiben
Judges:
19 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Learned counsel Mr. P. P. Thakkar fairly conceded that respondents have, at one stage, been represented by their union representative namely Mr. S. B. Chaudhary but as he is not an advocate, his name might not have been entered in the computer to be shown in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sonal vs Liverpool
Judges:
19 July, 2012·1. This application has been preferred by the applicant (original petitioner) with a prayer to grant an early date of hearing of Company Petition No.114 of 2011.2. Heard Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned advocate for the applicant and perused the averments made in the application.3. It is submitted that ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mena vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·1. This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 31/03/2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Diptiben vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·In view of the order passed earlier, learned APP Ms.Archana Raval, states that the recording of the evidence is over and the matter is at the stage of recording of further statement. It is further stated that there are 183 witnesses and further statements of 120 witnesses have been recorded and rema...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahmad vs Hindustan
Judges:
19 July, 2012·1. The petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief:"22(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the action of respondent No.1-Corporation of cancelling the procee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Motibhai vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Padhya urges that affidavit-in-reply to be brought on record.Request is granted. Matter is adjourned to 25th July 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.) abv/pt* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jan vs Gujarat
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Notice returnable on 31.07.2012.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Piyushbhai vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 6th August, 2012.Learned APP Ms. Archana Raval waives service of Notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Respondent No.2 is permitted to be served by Direct Service.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.