Bhai vs Chairman
Judges:
24 January, 2012·Heard Mr. I.M.Pandya, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 3 and4. The matter is kept part-heard. S.O. to 02.02.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gangadharprasad vs State
Judges:
24 January, 2012·Today when the matter was taken up, Mr. B.P. Jasani, learned advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner having expired and there being no legal heirs, he does not press the present petition. The petition is dismissed as having not been pressed. Liberty is reserved in case of difficulty.(...
High Court Of Gujarat
Adambhai vs State
Judges:
24 January, 2012·Mr.Mukul Sinha, learned advocate for the petitioner, upon instruction, submits that he is not pressing this application since the grievance is satisfied.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The application stands disposed of, as not pressed.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shrilal vs State
Judges:
24 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Buch for the applicant.Having regard to the facts of the case, leave to appeal is granted. The application stands disposed of accordingly.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghanshyambhai vs Suresh
Judges:
24 January, 2012·By way of this application, the applicant has made following prayers:-"A. Your lordship may be allow and admit this application and be pleased to grant the amendment as praposed in pera 6 of this application.B. Your lordship may be pleased to allow the applicant to amend the appeal memo of F.A. No.5...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Ravindra
Judges:
24 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matter appear on February 14, 2011.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING C.J.] mathew [J.B.PARDIWALA. J.] Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kundanben vs Kantibhai
Judges:
24 January, 2012·ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2012 In view of the averments, made in the application, the application deserves to be allowed. The application is allowed in terms of Paragraph No.4(B).Additional Court Fees will be paid, within a period of two weeks from today.ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.1012...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vidya vs State
Judges:
24 January, 2012·Await service of notice qua private respondent.Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till further order.[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ruchi vs Union
Judges:
24 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Petitioners have prayed for a writ directing the respondents to assess their imported goods viz., Crude Palm Oil of edible grade in terms of Customs Notification No. 21/2002 dated 1st March 2002 without applying subsequent Notification no. 120/2003 dated 1s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harisinh vs Government
Judges:
24 January, 2012·The complaint is lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504, 114 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act along with Section 3(1)(10) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. This application under Section 438 of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.