Ketankumar vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 28.09.2011 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Pankajkumar
Judges:
10 January, 2012·RULE returnable on 9.12.2011.[RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babubhai vs Sureshbhai
Judges:
10 January, 2012·Ms.Mandavia. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is not co-operating. Hence, in view of the aforesaid statement, the appeal stands dismissed for default.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pradyumansinh vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·The applicant has filed this application for regular bail, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with the offence being CR No. I - 10 of 2003 registered with C.I.D. Crime, Gandhinagar for the offence u/ss. 406, 420, 468, 471, 120(B) and 114 of Indian Penal Code read with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raval vs Arjanji
Judges:
10 January, 2012·The appellants could not be served in spite of all efforts. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for default.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Govindbhai vs Khushalbhai
Judges:
10 January, 2012·The present petition is directed against order dated 15.05.2009 passed by the learned first appellate court in Civil Misc. Appeal No.75 of 2008. The petitioner herein is the opponent in the said appeal.The said appeal was preferred by the original plaintiff upon being aggrieved by a common order dat...
High Court Of Gujarat
M vs Mr Dakshesh Mehta For
Judges:
10 January, 2012·On previous occasion it is noticed that the written statement / reply filed by the defendant is not available on record and is missing from the record / file of the suit. Mr.Dakshesh Mehta, learned advocate for the defendant had asserted that the written statement has been filed. His assertion prima...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendrasinh vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by reasoned order dated 15.04.2010 the competent authority found no justification to grant sanction, as required under law for prosecuting the petitioner. But upon disagreement by Gujarat Vigilance Commission, as per communication dated 27.09.2010, ear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajesh vs Mukesh
Judges:
10 January, 2012·1. Heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the papers on record.2. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 16.12.2000 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bhuj-Kutch in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 8 of 1997 so far as the Tribunal awarded only Rs. 99,600...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohmed vs Ds Aff.Not Filed (N) For
Judges:
10 January, 2012·The respondents could not be served. Learned counsel for the appellants sought adjournment to serve the respondents. Be served before the next date. To come up on 1st February 2012. The returnable date is extended upto 1st February 2012.[ MOHINDER PAL, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.