Saini vs Unknown
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) ADMIT.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [H.B. ANTANI, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheboobbhai vs Rehmatbhai
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Notice, returnable on 09.02.2012.[MOHINDER PAL, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Janaksinhji vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·1.0 Petitioner is the original accused. He seeks quashing of the complaint at Annexure-A , bearing I-C.R. No. 57 of 2007, dated 15.07.2007, filed before Muli Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 177 of the Indian Penal Code, on the ground that no off...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sonal vs Salil
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application is for interim injunction pending the First Appeal. This Court on 14.10.2010, had passed the following order:"After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for both the sides agree on the point that if the property is sold, either ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner vs First
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI) Challenge is to the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.4.2010 by proposing following questions of law for our consideration :(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.26,01,030/- made on acco...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babulal vs Special
Judges:
11 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order directing respondent No.1, Special Recovery Officer and Deputy Mamlatdar (Gratuity), Ahmedabad to recover the amount of gratuity from the respondent Nagarpal...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Murali N Devnani For
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) 1 We have heard learned Advocate Ms. Kruti M. Shah for appellants, learned Advocate Mr. Murali N. Devnani for respondent No.1 and learned AGP Mr. N.J. Shah for respondents No. 2 to 5.2 The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by the appellants - orig...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhabhai vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Rule.Mr.H.L.Jani, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.The applicant-original accused of Sessions Case No.36 of 2003, who is convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Porbandar for the offence punishable under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imtiyaz vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Rule.Learned APP Shri Pandya waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned advocate Shri Jasani waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2.Petitioner is original accused. He seeks quashing of complaint annexure A bearing C.R.No.I-62 of 2010 registered at Dhoraji Police Sta...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandansinh vs Indiraben
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The petitioner is the husband and normally he is supposed to deposit the amount including the cost so as to enable the wife to defend the case properly. At this stage, Mr. Buch for Mr. Pandya seeks time to inquire from his client as to whether he is ready t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.