Hasamukhbhai vs State
Judges:
27 January, 2012·Mr.S.V. Raju, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants are granted anticipatory bail and the orders subjecting to remand ought not to have been passed in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors....
High Court Of Gujarat
Iffco-Tokio vs Ramaben
Judges:
27 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Inspite of service, none appears for the respondents when the matter is called out.It appears that pursuant to our earlier order dated December 27, 2011, the appellant-applicant has already deposited the amount as indicated in the s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natubhai vs State
Judges:
27 January, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred, with the following prayers :"(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions directing the respondents herein to al...
High Court Of Gujarat
Noman vs Chief
Judges:
27 January, 2012·1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, with the following prayers:"YOUR LORDSHIPS BE PLEASED to issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction:-(a) By declaring that the inaction on the part of the responden...
High Court Of Gujarat
Seema vs State
Judges:
27 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the correct address of respondent No.2 is now available and the same will be supplied to the Registry and the cause title will be amended accordingly.Amendment to the cause title be made forthwith.Returnable date is extended to 15.2.2012.(ANANT S. DAV...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Hathising
Judges:
27 January, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Chaudhari for the petitioner requested for adjournment until 8th or 9th February, 2012. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Sudhir Nanavati with learned advocate Ms. A. S. Nanavati for respondent no.1 and learned advocate Mr. Vakil has no objection if the matter is adjourned.Hence, S. O...
High Court Of Gujarat
Darayas vs The
Judges:
27 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 24.02.2012.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayurbhai vs Jayaben
Judges:
27 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) ADMIT.Let notice of admission be issued, returnable on February 27, 2012.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING C.J.] [J.B.PARDIWALA. J.] mathew Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
A vs The
Judges:
27 January, 2012·1.0. Present Special Criminal Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner herein -original accused no.2 to quash and set aside the impugned complaint being Criminal Case No.868 of 2006 pending in th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shell vs State
Judges:
27 January, 2012·Heard Mr. K.S. Nanavati, learned senior advocate for the petitioners.Rule.Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1.In addition to what is recorded in the order dated 27.1.2012 attention is drawn to order dated 12.11.2010 and 27.9.2011 about decision of the competent authority...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.