Manubhai vs The
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Baria for the applicants and learned APP Mr. Nanavati for the opponent No.1 - State Authority.2. Learned advocate Mr. Baria requests for time on the ground that he is not in touch with his client for a long time. On the other hand, learned APP Mr. Nanavati states that beca...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijaykumar vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·NOTICE for final disposal returnable on 15.02.2012. Direct service permitted.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raval vs Ashokkumar
Judges:
30 January, 2012·1. A First Appeal preferred against the same impugned judgment and award has been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.08.2002 passed in F.A. No.1551/2002. For ready reference, the judgment is reproduced hereunder;"# The Insurance Company challenges the award dated 19th ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshchandra vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
30 January, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 17.02.2012. Direct service permitted.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khumansinh vs Kantibhai
Judges:
30 January, 2012·The endorsement on the board indicates that the notices issued to respondent Nos.1/1 to 1/5 and 5 have not been received back,either served or unserved. The Registry to await service of notices upon the said respondents. List the matter on 27-2-2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajubhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the detention order is revoked by the competent authority. Hence, this petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirenbhai vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this petition at this stage.Permission granted as prayed for. Petition stands disposed as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhaveshkumar vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Heard Ms. Mamta Vyas, learned Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Vyas has relied upon Government Circular dated 18.06.1999 which was applicable then, wherein, in condition no.2 it is specifically provided that same should apply in three contingencies viz. due to retirement or on any vacant post and on...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Amina
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Admit.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION1. Rule returnable on 12.03.2012.2. In the meantime, ad-interim relief in terms of para 5 (b) on condition that the applicant shall deposit the amount awarded by the Tribunal before the returnable date. On such amount being deposited, 70% of the amou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaldhara vs Gujarat
Judges:
30 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) Heard learned advocate Mr.Harmish K.Shah for the applicant and learned advocate Mr.H.S.Munshaw for the respondent No.1.The arguments advanced by learned advocate Mr.Harmish Shah for the applicant is that they have not obtained any loan from the respondent No....
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.