Gandabhai vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·No cogent reasons are made out to grant this application. Hence, rejected.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayur vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 17.02.2012. Ms. Megha Chitaliya, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Direct service is permitted for respondent no.5.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sonalben vs State
Judges: M R Shah
30 January, 2012·Stand over to 28/02/2012. With consent, ad-interim relief is modified permitting the Investigating Officer to investigate the Complaint and concerned Investigating Officer is directed to submit the report for perusal of this Court.(M.R.SHAH, J.) siji...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdulbhai vs Appearance
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Mr.Premal Rachh, learned advocate states that he would be filing appearance on behalf of the respondent and prays for time. At his request, the matter is adjourned to 9.2.2012.(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·The actual date of detention is 12.11.2011. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rabiya vs Ghanchi
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Heard Mr. M. A. Shaikh, learned advocate for Mr. L. R. Pathan, learned advocate for the applicants.Issue Rule returnable on 29.2.2012.(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Madinabibi
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Leave to delete respondents No. 7 and 8.At the request of Mr. Bhukhari, learned advocate, matter is adjourned to 08.02.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bherusinh vs Pratimaben
Judges:
30 January, 2012·No alternative arrangement has been made by the appellants so far. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maniben vs Vankar
Judges:
30 January, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Ajay L. Pandav, learned advocate for the appellants.2. ADMIT.3. The following substantial questions of law arise for determination :(I) Whether on the evidence adduced by the plaintiff, the courts below were justified in holding that the plaintiff was the owner of the suit land ?(II) Wh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shankarsinh vs Ode
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Mr.M.T. Mishra, learned advocate for Mr. T.R. Mishra for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition as the petitioners have already been reinstated by respondent No.1 Municipality. Permission is granted. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Notice discharged....
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.