Maniben vs Raval
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Rule.Mr.Sanjay D.Suthar, learned advocate, waives service of notice of Rule for respondents Nos.1 to 4. As the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal - respondent No.5 is a formal party, notice of Rule is not required to be issued to the said respondent.This application has been preferred by the applicants (origi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganeshji vs Collector
Judges:
30 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) Rule returnable on 07.02.2012. Direct service is permitted.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A.J.DESAI, J.) syed/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dalit vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 17.2.2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Respondent No.2 be served through court process.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bansilal vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that awarding Rs.15000/- in all to the respondent-wife and minor per month by learned Additional Judge, Family Court, Vadodara is against the evidence on record and known source of income of the petitioner by produci...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bashirbhai vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·1. This Application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the offence being CR No.I-172 of 2011 registered with Padra Police Station, Vadodara, for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 120(B) and 170 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Heard Mr.N.D....
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Considering the averments made in the application, this application is allowed. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.14407 of 2011 is restored to file at its original number. Office objections to be removed on or before 3.2.1012.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nanjibhai vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·The petitioner has taken a specific contention as averred in Paragraph No.4.17 of the petition and Mr.Adeshra, learned advocate for the petitioner, further contends that the case of the petitioner is similar to the case of the petitioners of Special Civil Application No.18614 of 2007 and allied matt...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Pravin
Judges:
30 January, 2012·ADMIT.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION Heard Mr. Parikh, learned counsel for the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the claimants are not entitled to more than Rs.1,15,000/- considering the facts of the case.Hence, Rule returnable on 12.03.2012. Ad-interim relie...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tanvizbanu vs Thro
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.After the amendment is carried out, NOTICE returnable on 17.02.2012. Direct service permitted.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.