Tirupati vs Ankur
Judges:
18 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 73 days in filing Appeal. Learned counsel Mr.Sikendar Saiyed appears for the respondent and states that he will be filing his Vakalatnama today in the office. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Consi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Unknown
Judges:
18 January, 2012·Issue fresh notice returnable on 17.2.2012.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Askar vs State
Judges:
18 January, 2012·Ad-interim relief granted earlier is modified to the extent permitting the Investigating Officer to investigate the case as it is alleged that even birth certificate issued by Surendranagar-Dudhrej Nagar Palika, produced by the accused is forged one.S.O.to 31/01/2012.[M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Ganeshbhai
Judges:
18 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Admit.Since Mr. Yatin Soni, learned Advocate has instructions to appear on behalf of the claimant-respondent and waives service of notice, appeal be treated as ready as regards service.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsinh vs Branch
Judges:
18 January, 2012·The present petition pertains to recovery of outstanding loan by the respondent-Bank. The Registry to examine and list the petition before the appropriate Court.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs None For
Judges:
18 January, 2012·In view of the order passed in Appeal from Order No.16 of 2012, this Civil Application does not survive and hence, the same stands disposed of.[ C. L. SONI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Batukbhai vs State
Judges:
18 January, 2012·This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed with the following prayers:"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent-Corporation to act as...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anandsing vs State
Judges:
18 January, 2012·This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.137/2011 with Limbayat Police Station, Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 498(A) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.Learned Counsel appea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatbhai vs Reshmaben
Judges:
18 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It appears that this appeal has been preferred against an order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Surat in a proceedings under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Therefore, in view of the provision containe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chanchalben vs State
Judges:
18 January, 2012·1. The petitioner by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for the following reliefs :"(A) Directing the Respondents to modify the orders dt.1.10.2002 and 25.11.2003 and grant the first higher grade scale to the petitioner with effect from 30.6.1992 instead o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.