Praveenben vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Record shows that respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 are State Government and the authorities have not been served. Hence, advance copy is served on Mr. Alkesh Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader. S.O. to 14.02.2012 to enable Mr. Shah to take instructions in the matter.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT To...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nanjibhai vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·To enable Mr. D.G.Shukla, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 to file Affidavit-in-Reply, S.O. to 13.02.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanatbhai vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. Vide order dated 19.01.2012 considering the factual aspect of the case this Court had passed the following order :"1. Ms.Megha Chitaliya, learned AGP appears on advance copy. Earlier this Court (Coram: H.K. Rathod, J.) vide order dated 6.2.2007 passed in Special Civil Application No.3279 of 2007 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsinh vs Ghusar
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Mahendra Patel, learned AGP for the respondents.2. In pursuance of the order dated 23.1.2012 and previous order dated 28.12.2011, Ms. Manisha Chandra, Collector Panchmahal, Mr. M.M. Patel, Taluka Development Officer and Mr. J.L. Majmud...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvindbhai vs Managing
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. Heard Ms. Reena Kamani, learned advocate for Mr. P.H. Pathak, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. P.S. Gogia, learned advocate for the opponent.2. The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief / direction:-"4(A) Be pleased to allow this application and perm...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Kantilal
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Mr.Mehta, learned counsel for the applicant states that respondent no. 4 is deleted.Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. Firs...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Chaudhari
Judges:
23 January, 2012·By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kutch in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.118 of 1988, whereby the Tribunal has awarded Rs.4,28,000/- to original claimant with running interest at the rate of 15% p.a. from the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saraswati vs Ashaben
Judges:
23 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It appears that the disputes involved in these writ-applications have already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court on August 17, 2011 made in Special Civil Application No. 2157 of 2011 with Special Civil Application 9022 o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Heirs vs Sardarji
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. First Appeal to be listed for admission on 31.01.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.