Nitinbhai vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-3 of 2012 registered with Chandkheda Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 436 and 114 of th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijaykumar vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Mr.Ketan D. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner has filed sick-note. Since the petition is of 1992, place on 27.01.2012.[N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Bhagvanji
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. By way of these appeals, the appellant-Insurance Company has challenged the common judgment and award dated 07.12.2000, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxiliary), Gondal, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 376 of 1993, No.329 of 1993 and No.323 of 1993, whereby the tribunal has a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rashmi vs Ketankumar
Judges:
23 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) This is an application by the appellant-wife for stay of execution of the impugned decree for divorce granted by the learned Family Court.After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this application by restraini...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mansingbhai vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. Rule.Mr. Jani, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the State. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is taken up for hearing today.2. This is an application preferred by the applicant under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking bail ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baiju vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·The jail authority is directed to give necessary instructions to the applicant for preferring fresh application for furlough. If fresh application for furlough will be preferred by the applicant, then it will be decided by the competent authority on its own merits and considering the fact that when ...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Kasam
Judges:
23 January, 2012·It appears that respondent no.2 herein is the wife of respondent no.1. Hence, respondent no.1 shall be treated as heir and legal representative of respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 is permitted to be deleted. It is stated that respondent no.3 is served. If that be so, then affidavit of service to be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prakashsinh vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Learned advocate Ms.Mebha Pandya for learned advocate Ms.Kruti Shah for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application stands disposed of, as withdrawn.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ritaben Samuelbhai Solanki Wd/O Sunil Kantilal Vyas vs Kantilal Manasheh Vyas
Judges: Rajesh H Shukla
23 January, 2012·1. The present First Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant -Original Defendant under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the impugned judgment and order passed by the City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Civil Suit No.674 of 2005 dated 27.9.2010 on the grounds set out in t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kiritbhai G Shah vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
23 January, 2012·1. The present Special Criminal Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner-original accused no. 2 to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad da...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.