Cadbury vs State
Judges:
27 February, 2012·At the request of Mr.B.S.Raju, leaned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants, as a last chance, Registry is directed to issue fresh notice of Rule upon respondent No.2, making it returnable on 19th March,2012.Direct service is permitted.[M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Prajapati For The Applicants And ...
Judges:
27 February, 2012·1. The present Civil Applications have been filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeals on the grounds stated in the applications that the advocate received the copy of the judgment and informed the applicants and, thereafter, sometime is consumed for contacting the advocate an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Urvakunj Nicotine Ltd vs Union Of India & 3
Judges:
27 February, 2012·URVAKUNJ NICOTINE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA & 3 - Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR ASIM J. PANDYA for HL PATEL ADVOCATES for Petitioners in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONS No.18842 of 2011, 18844 to 18865 of 2011 MR MIHIR THAKORE, SR. ADVOCATE with MR...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kiranbhai vs Samirbhai
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI) Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 212 days in filing First Appeal (St.)No.3274 of 2011. We have been taken through the contents of the application, especially contents of para 5 of the application. We are convinced that the applicant has made out suffici...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Shyamcharan
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, Civil Applications are allowed in terms of para 4 (A) & (B).Issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents in the respective main matters in view of the order in Civil Applications making it returnable on 02.04.2012. Direct service is permitted...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Janaksinh
Judges:
27 February, 2012·1. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to delete respondent no. 1 - driver. Permission is granted. Respondent no. 1 stands deleted from the proceedings. The claimants are served.2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue as i...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Jayvantiben
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, Mohanlal Ukarmal Gangvani, the husband of Jayvantiben @ Khema, is present and he states that Jayvantiben is in Vadodara Jail and he wants time to engage advocate. SO to 20.3.2012.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [PARESH UPADHY...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maniben vs District
Judges:
27 February, 2012·Heard Ms.Sudha R.Gangwar, learned advocate for the petitioners. It is submitted by her that the Principal Secretary (Appeals) has, in his order dated 07.09.2011, wrongly mentioned the entries with regard to the land of the petitioners, as being Entries Nos.4308 and 9984, whereas, the entry under cha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balubhai vs Shree
Judges:
27 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Await service of rule to respondent Nos.1 & 2. Put up these applications on 5.3.2012. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.Sd/-[V.M. SAHAI, J.] Sd/-[A.J. DESAI, J.] Savariya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.