United vs Luhana
Judges:
08 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the appellant shall take action for unserved respondent within a period of four weeks from today failing which appeal shall stand dismissed qua unserved respondent/for default. Matter to come up on 12.03.2012.Civil Applications may not be shown on board.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya//...
High Court Of Gujarat
Spl vs Hiraben
Judges:
08 February, 2012·Rule returnable on 7 th March, 2012.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
08 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.Bailable warrant be issued for the sum of Rs. 5000/- against each of the accused.To be hearing with Criminal Appeal No. 682/2011.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] mandora/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Somabhai
Judges:
08 February, 2012·The present Civil Application has been filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeal on the grounds stated in the application inter alia the time was consumed in processing the papers and according sanction, which has resulted into this delay.Heard learned counsel, Mr.S.P. Hasurka...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs This Appeal Will
Judges:
08 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) ADMIT.This appeal will be heard on the following substantial questions of law:[a]. The appellant before the Tribunal not having challenged the order passed by the Commissioner [Appeals] under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mrs Nisha M Parikh For
Judges:
08 February, 2012·BELOW SPEAKING TO MINUTES Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties.The Speaking to Minutes referred to the typographical error that in paragraph 18 of the judgment that the words "deserves to be allowed" are required to be substituted and corrected as "deserves to be quashed".The registry i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshbhai vs Deputy
Judges:
08 February, 2012·RULE.Mr.Apurva Dave, learned advocate appears and waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirubhai vs Commandant
Judges:
08 February, 2012·1. While issuing Rule, on 11.03.1996, this Court passed following order:"Rule.By way of interim relief, it is directed that the respondent authorities shall take a decision in the case of the petitioner as regards his promotion to the post of Head Constable Grade-II in context of their earlier commu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sardar vs Sendhabhai
Judges:
08 February, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Pandya, learned counsel for the petitioner society.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had not terminated the services of the respondent, however, on incorrect allegations he raised dispute and approached the Court. He also submitted that even in the repl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Punambhai vs State
Judges:
08 February, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 21.2.2012.Meanwhile, recovery of the arrears of the salary granted to the petitioner on the basis of recommendations of 6th Pay Commission and Government Resolutions dated 12.2.2009 and 27.2.2009 shall remain stayed. Direct service is permitted.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.