Suresh vs Mohan
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 5[B] [C] and [D[. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL In view of the order passed in Civil Application No. 11621 of 2012, fresh notice to respondents nos. 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs M. Sahai
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned Advocate Ms. Lilu K Bhaya for the appellants. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appeal is allowed. The order dated 27.1.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in M.C.A. No. 233 of 2012 in Special Civil Application (St.) No. 13664...
High Court Of Gujarat
Apurva vs July
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) First Appeal is already admitted.To be placed for hearing in due course.(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (C.L.SONI, J.) omkar Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muradkhan vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-183 of 2011 registered with Makarpura Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 120B and 75 of IPC.H...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs M. Sahai
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) 1 We have heard Mr. V.C. Vaghela, learned Advocate for the petitioner .2 This petition has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that he has applied to the respondent No.2 - Director, Agriculture Marketing and Rural Finance for grant of licence and, in ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harijan vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Mr.Dipak H. Sindhi, learned advocate for the petitioner, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with a view to making a representation to the Competent Authority.Permission to withdraw the petition, is granted. The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheshkumar vs Prajapati
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Rule to respondent nos. 1 and 3 returnable on 26.03.2012. Mr. Nair, learned counsel waive service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 2, Mr. Sood, learned counsel waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 4 and Mr. Gohil, learned counsel waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no.5.I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayaben vs Navinchandra
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 5[A] & [B]. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL In view of the order passed in Civil Application No. 1723 of 2012, fresh notice to respondents no. 3 returna...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rishi vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Rule.Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents No.1 & 2.(Z.K.SAIYED, J.) sas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tahir vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Though the matter is called out thrice, learned advocate Mr. Shastri for respondent No.2 is not present. In Second Session, on fourth call, the learned advocate Mr. Rana for Mr. Shastri is present and states that Mr. Shastri, learned advocate is busy with some other Court. He prays for time. S.O. to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.