Bankimbhai Bhikhubhai Desai & 1 ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
13 February, 2012·BANKIMBHAI BHIKHUBHAI DESAI & 1 Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR ZUBIN F BHARDA for Applicant(s) : 1 2. MR JK SHAH ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 2, =========================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bankimbhai vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants and it is submitted that basically the dispute is of civil nature and impugned proceedings undertaken by the complainant are nothing but an abuse of process of law.Notice returnable on 21.2.2012. Learned APP, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nituben vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release her on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-98 of 2011 registered with Dwarka Police Station.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant that ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hotel vs Appellate
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Heard Mr. Ashish Shah, learned advocate for the appellant.Issue Notice returnable on 12th March, 2012.[HARSHA DEVANI, J.] parmar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Shardaben
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Notice to respondent nos. 4 and 5 returnable on 19.03.2012.Office is directed to call for the R & P, so as to reach this Court on or before 19.03.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balabhai vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·1. This application has been sent through jail for releasing the applicant on parole.2. It appears that the incident of murder took place in 2010 and the prisoner was arrested on 23-4-2010. He is convicted by the Sessions Court in serious offence. Considering these facts, his application has been ri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shelatkumar vs Amad
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent No. 1 from the title clause of the appeal. Permission as prayed for is granted. The learned advocate for the appellant is permitted and ordered to delete respondent No. 1 from the title clause of the appeal. Matter is ready. To...
High Court Of Gujarat
Snigdha vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Leave to produce the relevant order on record.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Association vs Union
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2 to file further affidavit on or before 16th February, 2012. Matters to be posted for hearing on 21st February, 2012. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sumitaben vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Learned Advocate Mr. Nagesh states that he has received instruction to appear on behalf of respondent No.2 and he will file his Vakalatnama in the office, during the course of the day.Heard learned Advocate for the applicant, learned APP for the respondent No.1, and learned Advocate appearing for th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.