Telecome vs Cement
Judges:
21 February, 2012·In view of the Office Circular being No. Judicial/01/2012 dated February 08, 2012, needful is to be done at the end of the Registry. Hence this application is disposed of, with a liberty to the applicants to file afresh in case of difficulty on their attempt in reconstructing the matter.Civil applic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rambeti vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Heard Mr.L.R.Pathan, learned advocate for the applicant, Mr.H.L.Jani, learned APP for the respondent - State and Mr.Nirav Mishra, learned advocate for the respondent No.2.Office is directed to call for the record and proceedings from the trial Court so as to reach this Court on or before 28.3.2012. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dayaswarup vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Mr.V.H.Nangesh, learned counsel tenders affidavit-in-reply which is taken on record.Mr.Pushpadatta Vyas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time to file affidavit-in-rejoinder.Hence, S.O. to 05.03.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Urmilaben vs Gurudevsinh
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Heard.Considering the averments made in the applications, the same are allowed in terms of Paras 3-(A) & (B). Returnable date extended up to 19.03.2012. Both the applications are, accordingly, disposed of.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hemubha vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule returnable on 13th March 2012. Learned advocate Shri Kayur Gandhi for Nanavati Associates waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2.(Akil Kureshi J.) (C.L.Soni, J.) (vjn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Ghanshyambhai
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Respondent No.2 is allowed to be deleted in the present Civil Application.Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is made absolute accordingly.First Appeal to be listed on ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhikhaji vs Adalaj
Judges:
21 February, 2012·The matter has been called out thrice. None appears for the applicants. The application is dismissed for non-prosecution.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ayubkhan vs Attaullakhan
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Mr.Sunil Joshi learned advocate appears for respondent No.2 and Mr. Ashok Parmar, learned advocate appears for respondent No.2-A.Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
T vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Without entering into merit of the case at this stage the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition, keeping it open for the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy under the Code so that the trial Court can examine all relevant material for the purpose of exercising powers under Section ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natural vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?To be referred to the Reporter or not ?Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.