John vs Paschim
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Rule.It is however, made clear that it would be open for the petitioner to file appropriate application before the respondent authority for considering the grievances raised in the present petition, in changed circumstances of the revision having been withdrawn by the original complainant.Sd/-(R.M.C...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lupin vs Unknown
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.Having gone through the contents of the application, the same is allowed. Amendment as prayed for in prayer clause No.4(B) is granted. The cause-title of the appeal and application to be amended accordingly. Disposed of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Hasmukh
Judges:
23 February, 2012·The learned advocate for the appellant/s is directed to take appropriate action qua the unserved respondent/s within a period four weeks from today, failing which the matter will stand dismissed qua the said respondent/s. The matter is adjourned to 26.03.2012. It is, however, observed that if no act...
High Court Of Gujarat
Memon vs Rahimbhai
Judges:
23 February, 2012·This appeal is against the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.The Office is directed to place in due course.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lalaji vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Notice, returnable on 7.3.2012.(R.M. CHHAYA, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bipinbhai vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Notice returnable on 28.2.2012.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kumari vs Union
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Draft amendment is granted. To be carried out on or before 27.02.2012.S.O.to 05.03.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Galabji vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·1. Vide order dated 31.1.2012, this Court had passed the following order:-"6. In view of the above, since the matter pertains to pension, the respondent authorities are directed to examine the case of the petitioner considering the judgment of this Court in the case of State of Gujarat Vs. Mahendrak...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Dashlabhai
Judges:
23 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that occurred on 20.10.2005 in which Keshaben expired, the legal heirs of deceased filed M.A.C.P. No.1193/2005 u/s. 163-A of the M.V. Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Rajkot. The said claim petition came to be disposed of by judgment ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tejuben vs Shantaben
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Heard learned advocates Mr.Jigar P.Rawal for the appellant and Mr.Viral K.Shah for the respondent No.5. Though served, rest of the respondents No.1 to 4 have not appeared when called.With a joint request, this Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. Parties shall be at liberty to make a request to the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.