Navghanbhai vs Devisinh
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Respondent No.1 is allowed to be deleted. Learned advocate Mr.Shah requests for time.S.O.to 06.03.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kashiben vs Ms.Sheeja
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Ms.Sheeja G. Nayar, learned advocate for Mr.G.M.Amin, learned advocate for the applicants, prays for time, in order to take instructions regarding the unserved respondents and to supply the correct address of respondent No.1/4 in the Registry. The needful be done on, or before, 21.03.2012.List on 22...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prathmesh vs Malde
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Issue notice to respondent nos. 2 to 7 returnable on 7/3/2012. Mr. PP Majmudar, learned advocate for respondent no. 1 waives service of notice. Rest to be served by direct service.(MS.SONIA GOKANI, J) asma Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anjana vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Draft amendment is granted. To be carried out forthwith.The respondents are directed to file affidavit-in-reply to the said amendment latest by 05.03.2012. S.O. to 06.03.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat vs It Has Been Stated By The Learned ...
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)1. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that conviction appeals have been preferred being Criminal Appeal Nos. 62 of 2011, 63 of 2011, 90 of 2011, 92 of 2011, 91 of 2011, 88 of 2011, 78 of 2011, 779 of 2011 and 781 of 2011. Hence, Ad...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs It
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) It has been stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that conviction appeals have been preferred being Criminal Appeal Nos. 62 of 2011, 63 of 2011, 90 of 2011, 92 of 2011, 91 of 2011, 88 of 2011, 78 of 2011, 779 of 2011 and 781 of 2011. Hence, Admi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Iffco vs Shantaben
Judges:
23 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that occurred on 02.01.2006 in which Veenaben expired, the legal heirs of deceased filed M.A.C.P. No.136/2006 u/s. 163-A of the M.V. Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sabarkantha at Modasa. The said claim petition came to be disposed of by ju...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chaturba vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-30 of 2011 registered with Kothara Police Station.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khodabhai vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Ms.C.M.Shah, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.This application is filed by the applicant-convict through his wife Savitaben with the request that the applicant-convict may be enlarged on temporary bail on the grou...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Bhupatbhai
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
23 February, 2012·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 01.03.2008 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Bhavnagar in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 257 of 2003, wherein the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 2,86,100/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.