Chauhan Govindbhai Gordhanbhai & 463S vs India Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Now Known As Reliance
Judges: Ks Jhaveri Page
19 December, 2012·Common questions on law and facts are involved in this group of petitions and hence, they are decided by this common judgment. RULE. Learned counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. With the consent of both the sides, the matters were taken up for final hearing today. 1. Can the Labo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chauhan Govindbhai Gordhanbhai & 463S vs India Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Now Known As Reliance
Judges: Ks Jhaveri Page
19 December, 2012·Common questions on law and facts are involved in this group of petitions and hence, they are decided by this common judgment. RULE. Learned counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. With the consent of both the sides, the matters were taken up for final hearing today. 1. Can the Labo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chauhan Govindbhai Gordhanbhai & 463S vs India Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Now Known As Reliance
Judges: Ks Jhaveri Page
19 December, 2012·Common questions on law and facts are involved in this group of petitions and hence, they are decided by this common judgment. RULE. Learned counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. With the consent of both the sides, the matters were taken up for final hearing today. 1. Can the Labo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chauhan Govindbhai Gordhanbhai & 463S vs India Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Now Known As Reliance
Judges: Ks Jhaveri Page
19 December, 2012·Common questions on law and facts are involved in this group of petitions and hence, they are decided by this common judgment. RULE. Learned counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. With the consent of both the sides, the matters were taken up for final hearing today. 1. Can the Labo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chauhan Govindbhai Gordhanbhai & 463S vs India Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd Now Known As Reliance
Judges: Ks Jhaveri Page
19 December, 2012·Common questions on law and facts are involved in this group of petitions and hence, they are decided by this common judgment. RULE. Learned counsel for the respondent waives service of rule. With the consent of both the sides, the matters were taken up for final hearing today. 1. Can the Labo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshvar Madhulal Shah vs Gordhanbhai Kacharabhai Decd Thro Heirs & Ors
Judges: A J Desai
19 December, 2012·1 The petitioner – original defendant- tenant, by way of the present Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (“the Rent Act” for short), has challenged the judgment and decree dated 28.7.2004, passed by Small Causes Court...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 2 vs Pradip Shishpal Sharma
Judges: S G Shah, Vijay Manohar Sahai
19 December, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI) 1. We have heard Mr.Rakesh R.Patel, learned A.G.P. for the appellants and Mr.A.S.Supehia, learned advocate for the respondent.2. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the order of learned single Judge dated 24.3.2011 passed in Spe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chimanlal K Patel vs Dena Bank & 1
Judges: S G Shah, Vijay Manohar Sahai
19 December, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH) 1. The judgment and order dated 23.8.2012 in Special Civil Application No.3925 of 1998 dismissing the petition of the present appellant for quashing and setting-aside his order of dismissal by the respondents is under challenge in the present appeal.2. Lear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Primary Health Centre & 1 vs K R Lalpurwala
Judges: S G Shah, Vijay Manohar Page
19 December, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1635 of 2012 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11045 of 2002 With CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13733 of 2012 In LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1635 of 2012 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI and HONOURABLE MR.JU...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parshottambhai Harishbhai Patel & 5 vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: Jayant Patel
19 December, 2012·1. Petitioners have preferred the present petition to challenge the order passed by the Mamlatdar dated 1.5.1995 and its confirmation thereof by the Deputy Collector and the Revenue Tribunal; whereby, certain portion of the land held by the petitioner Nos.1 and 4 are declared as surplus land under G...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.