Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation vs Jayantilal Pitamberbhai Dhangadharia & 5 Defendants
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
17 August, 2012·The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment and award dated 29/5/2000 passed by the Ld. M.A.C. Tribunal [Main], Rajkot, and the original opponent nos. 1 to 5, namely the appellant as well as respondent nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6, were directed to pay said amount of compensation with...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 4 vs Karadia Ranmal Lakhmanbhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
17 August, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. As all the Appeals arise from a common judgment and award of the Reference Court, they are being considered simultaneously. The Reference Court has awarded compensation for the trees of Rs.01,54,42,700/- as stated in the Schedule with interest with solat...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 4 vs Karadia Ranmal Lakhmanbhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
17 August, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. As all the Appeals arise from a common judgment and award of the Reference Court, they are being considered simultaneously. The Reference Court has awarded compensation for the trees of Rs.01,54,42,700/- as stated in the Schedule with interest with solat...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 4 vs Karadia Ranmal Lakhmanbhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
17 August, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. As all the Appeals arise from a common judgment and award of the Reference Court, they are being considered simultaneously. The Reference Court has awarded compensation for the trees of Rs.01,54,42,700/- as stated in the Schedule with interest with solat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mongiben Premji & 1 vs Khodabhai Pitambarbhai & 4 Defendants
Judges: Md Shah Fa 5159 1998
17 August, 2012·1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.), Morbi dated 22.7.1998 in Special Civil Suit No.4 of 1990, whereby the suit of the present appellants-original plaintiffs was dismissed by the learned trial Court.2. The brief facts leading to filing of the pres...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manharlal Viththaldas Kava Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
17 August, 2012·1.0 Present Civil Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “Rent Act”) has been preferred by the petitioner herein original plaintiff (now through subsequent purchaser) to quash and set aside the impugn...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravji Valji Khunt Opponents
Judges: M R Shah Sd, M R Shah
17 August, 2012·1.0 Present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner hereinoriginal plaintiff decree holder to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Executing Court learned 5th Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Junagadh passed...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kesardevi Madhavprasad Khandelwal Grren Filed & Ors vs Gopal Morlidhar Khandewal & Ors
Judges: A J Desai
17 August, 2012·1 Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners – original plaintiffs of Civil Suit No. 3269 of 1998 have challenged the Order passed below Application Exhibit-106 filed by them for recasting of issues framed at Exhibit-41 in the said proceedings, which was rejected vide Order ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vadgama Stone Quarry Prop Manoj B Vadgama vs State Of Gujarat Thr Secretary & 3
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
17 August, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner is a proprietary concern and is engaged in industrial activity of running a quarry unit presently located at Village Tharodi in Taluka Savarkundla. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 10.4.2006, as at Annexure “D” to the p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayman Bhaskarbhai Vasavda vs The Junagadh Agriculture University
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
17 August, 2012·1. The petitioner, workman in Reference No. LCJ/150/1998 before Labour Judge, Junagadh Labour Court has preferred this petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award & order dated 5/12/2001, where under the Labour Court rejected the reference for the reason...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.