Abdul vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw present application. Permission is granted. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Firojbanu vs Bhavnagar
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. Leave to amend the prayer clause.2. RULE.Mr. Rajesh Chauhan, learned advocate for Mr. H.S. Munshaw waives service of Rule on behalf of the opponent - original petitioner.3. With consent of the parties and considering the fact that the present application is for bringing the heirs of the deceased ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhabhai vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·The appellants-original accused No.6, 7 and 8 were awarded 2 years' sentence by the Sessions Court and they were released on bail as they were ladies.Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.Considering the fact that the applicants-original accused No. 6, 7 a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohamad Sabir vs Aamna­Khatun
Judges:
11 April, 2012·MOHAMAD SABIR S/O SAHID ALI ANSARI Applicant(s) Versus AAMNAKHATUN W/O SABIR SAHID ANSARI & 1 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR PAWAN A BAROT for Applicant(s) : 1, MS. MEGHNA A PATEL for Respondent(s) : 1, MR JK SHAH ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Hk Patel
Judges:
11 April, 2012·1. The petitioner 'Shree Gandhi Maulana Azad Ashara' has filed the present petition being aggrieved by order dated 23.08.2007 made by the Joint Secretary (Developing Caste), Social Justice & Welfare Department, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar, whereby order dated 25.07.2006 made by the Director, Developing...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance :
Judges:
11 April, 2012·The State has preferred this appeal from judgment and order dated 11.02.2005, whereby the respondent, aged 20, was acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 394 and 114 of IPC, by giving him the benefit of doubt. It was seen from the impugned judgement that another accused person was absco...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umada vs Mr Dk Modi For
Judges:
11 April, 2012·Delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned in view of satisfactory explanation furnished by uncontroverted averments made on oath in the application. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. Main Criminal Appeal No.26 of 2005 may be listed along with Criminal Appeal Nos.24...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shelke vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN) Issue notice, returnable on 31.8.2009.Ms.Monali Bhatt waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.Direct service to respondent No.4 is permitted.(K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,C.J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) (raghu) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Win vs Vice
Judges:
11 April, 2012·The petitioner by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has approached this Court with following prayers:"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dtd. 18.11.2011...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khimkaranji vs State
Judges:
11 April, 2012·Rule.Mr.A.J.Desai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State of Gujarat.The present application has been filed by the applicant-accused under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for regular bail.The applicant accused is charged with ha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.