Rajeshbhai vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, by imposing suitable conditions, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that applicant is in jail since 12.4.2012.2. Heard learned APP for th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shashikantbhai vs B
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. Vide order dated 9.4.2012, this Court had passed the following order:-"ADMIT.Mr. P.J. Patel, learned counsel waives service of notice of admission on behalf of the respondent.Order of advertisement is deferred till 30.04.2012."2. Heard Ms. Amita S. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bababhai vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Vaishnav appearing for the applicant and learned AGP Mr. Janak Raval for respondent-State.2. The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief/s:"7(B).Prayers made in the main Special Civil Application be granted and the respondent be further...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kumbahni vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·[1] Rule.Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.[2] Present application is filed by the applicant for deleting / modifying condition nos.7(d) and condition no.7(e) imposed vide order dated 02.08.2001 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application No....
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Rule Served For
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. This application has been filed by the heirs of deceased Surajba Dosaji Jadeja, seeking condonation of delay of 1430 days in filing the First Appeal. First Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nimeshbhai vs Baroda
Judges:
30 April, 2012·ORDER IN SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION.The petitioners have taken out present petition seeking below mentioned relief:-"10B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the impugne...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashok vs Present
Judges:
30 April, 2012·[1.0] Present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred by the petitioner herein - original defendant to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 07.02.2012 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Anjar, Kutch below applicat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mono vs Union
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue notice returnable after a fortnight. Direct service on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is permitted. Petitioner is at liberty to apply for interim order in case of any subsequent event.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala...
High Court Of Gujarat
Through vs Union
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue notice returnable after a fortnight. No interim order at this stage.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) */Mohandas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mananbhai vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Mr.Shital R. Patel, learned advocate for respondent No.6 submits that he shall be filing the affidavit-in-reply in the Registry, during the course of the day. Mr.M.B.Rana, learned advocate for Mr.Trilok J. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioners, prays for time, in order to go through the same a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.