Priyankaben vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Though served none appears for respondent no.3.Learned advocate for the petitioner invited Court's attention to the advertisement and contended that the production of certificate qua local residency which is unf...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantilal vs Subhashchandra
Judges:
20 April, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the present appellant-original claimants has challenged the judgement and award dated 30.03 2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Bharuch, in M.A.C.P. No.803 of 1992, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.2,47,000/- to the claiman...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kishanbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Since the applicant has complied with the direction contained in our order dated March 9, 2012, we extend the interim order earlier granted till the disposal of the main matter.The application is disposed of.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Subodhbhai vs Dwarkesh
Judges:
20 April, 2012·At the request of Mr. Adesara, leaned advocate appearing for Mr. Ravindra Shah, learned advocate for the applicant, office is directed to issue fresh Notice qua opponent Nos. 2 (B) and 2 (C) i.e. Shailesh Jagmohandas Parikh and Vijaykumar Jagmohandas Parikh. The fresh Notice to be made returnable on...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs Abbas
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Delay of 57 days in preferring the appeal is condoned in view of uncontroverted averments made in the application. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.(D.H.Waghela,J) (Mohinder Pal,J) pathan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jasminbhai vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) [1] This appeal was filed with office objections and this Court, vide order dated 29.11.2007 had granted time to remove office objections. However, since that was not done, the appeal stood dismissed for non-removal of office objections, at the relevant ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsinh vs As
Judges:
20 April, 2012·As per the office note, it appears that the notice of Rule is to be served upon respondent no. 2/3 instead of respondent no. 2/2.In that view of the matter, office to issue fresh notice of Rule on the unserved respondent no. 2/3 making it returnable on 11.06.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jamnalal vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicant.2. By way of present application, the applicant seeks deletion of condition No.4 (e) of the order dated 14.6.2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.5518 of 2010 and modified vide an order dated 23.3.2011 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Applicat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kantibhai vs Special
Judges:
20 April, 2012·1. Present Civil Application has been filed by the applicants for condonation of delay of 209 days in filing the aforesaid first appeal on the grounds stated in the application, inter alia, that the applicants were making the arrangement for resources for payment of court fees and the fees of the ad...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Rahul Dave
Judges:
20 April, 2012·1. Pure and heartburning grievance made by the petitioner in this petition is to the effect that the petitioner is superseded in the matter of promotion by his junior one Shri Kavji Nathu Chaudhary to the post of Head Constable Gr. II. The petitioner has made prayer seeking direction to the responde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.