IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.50664/2015 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
SMT.ZAREENA TAJ, D/O M REHMAN KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O BAGLUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE.
(BY SRI ARUN ASHOK GADAG, ADVOCATE) AND:
... PETITIONER 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KHANIZA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. MR. IQBAL AHAMAD, S/O LATE SRI M.REHAMAN KHAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.E-9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEW GURAPANNAPALYA, BANGALORE-560 029.
(R-3 IMPLEADED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 11.01.2017) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R-1; SRI ASHOK N. NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI D.R.RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) …… THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO ALLOW THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19.06.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-F FOR DISBURSEMENT OF COMPENSATION WITH RESPECT TO SY.NO.6 MEASURING 8 ACRES SITUATED AT SINGANAYAKANAHALLI, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The petitioner in the above writ petition has sought to direct the second respondent-Special Land Acquisition Officer to allow the petitioner’s representation dated 19.06.2015 vide Annexure-F for disbursement of compensation with respect to Sy.No.6 measuring 8 acres situated at Singahalli, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk.
2. The matter is heard at length on several occasions.
3. Today, Sri Ashok N. Nayak, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submitted that the entire amount in respect of Sy.No.6 of Singahalli, Bengaluru North Taluk has been already deposited before the Deputy Commissioner.
4. The submission is placed on record.
5. In view of the above, the prayer sought in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed off.
6. However, it is needles to observe that it is for the aggrieved parties to take necessary steps, in accordance with law.
Sd/- JUDGE kcm