Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Zakir vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23338 of 2019 Petitioner :- Zakir Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Kumar Sachan
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumar Sachan, learned counsel for respondents no. 4 and 5.
Petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction upon respondents not to initiate recovery proceedings in respect of the electricity dues and to restore the electricity connection of the petitioner.
The petitioner has not challenged any demand of electricity dues. No demand notice has been enclosed nor any recovery citation is said to have been issued against the petitioner.
In view of above, we find that there is no material on record to establish that any demand of electricity dues is being raised against the petitioner. There is nothing in this petition to indicate as to when the electricity of the petitioner was disconnected and the reasons for its disconnection.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, there is hardly any cause of action for the petitioner to file this petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.7.2019 Vandana
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Zakir vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Pandey