Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yusuf And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26838 of 2019 Petitioner :- Yusuf And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Sri Satya Narayan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajesh Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India. In fact it is a suit for injunction seeking a direction upon respondents not to interfere in alleged construction over land in question.
3. Remedy available to petitioner in common law is to seek injunction by filing a suit before appropriate Court.
4. Writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Ashish Pd.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yusuf And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Shukla