IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2648 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
1. YUSUF SHARIFF S/O DASTAGIR SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.22/1, 1ST FLOOR, KEVERIAPPA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560052 2. AMREEN W/O SALEEM AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT DODDA BETTADAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH ADDITIONAL TALUK, BANGALORE-560064 3. SHAZIYA W/O YUSUF SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT EMBASSSY HABITATED, FLAT 1702, PALACE ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE-560052 4. NAVEED S/O DASTAGIR SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.46/2, 4TH CROSS, K S GARDEN, BANGALORE-560027 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND 1. UMRA SHARIFF D/O YOUSUFF SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, R/AT NO.13/1, KEVERIAPPA LAYOUT, MILLAR TANK BUND ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE 561052 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION, BANGALORE-560001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP FOR R2; SRI: RATHNAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1-ABSENT) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.317/2014 OF HIGH GROUNDS P.S. BANGALORE WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CCH-51, CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
2. Perused the petition.
3. Petitioners have sought to quash the FIR registered against them in Crime No.317/2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 354 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
4. When the matter is taken up herein, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.2-State submitted that after trial all the petitioners are acquitted of the above charges by judgment and order dated 10.12.2015. In view of the said submission, nothing further survives for consideration in this petition.
5. accordingly, petition is dismissed.
In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2015 filed for stay does not survive for consideration, accordingly, it is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE bkp