The petitioner was aggrieved with the notification issued for appointment, produced herein as Ext.P6. The contention was that, there is a Vigilance enquiry pending against the President of the Society (i.e., 4th respondent). There was also an interim order that, the appointments shall not be made except with the concurrence of the jurisdictional Joint Registrar of Co- operative Societies. Evidently, the term of the said managing committee has expired and another committee elected to office is now in charge. 2.In such circumstance, none of the prayers in the writ petition would survive. The petitioner would contend that there should be a direction to expedite the Vigilance enquiry proceedings against the 4th respondent. It is not clear as to what is the stage of the Vigilance enquiry proceedings. That definitely will have W.P.(C) No.11415 of 2008 (H) 2 to be expedited in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the writ petition would stand closed.
AMV/02/12/ Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE