Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8494 of 2021 Applicant :- Yogendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Amit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Azad Singh, learned AGA, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
Referring to paragraph no.3 of the supplementary affidavit accompanying this bail application learned counsel for the applicant submits that the name of the applicant has wrongly been mentioned as Yogendra @ Major in place of Yogendra.
Computer Centre of this Court directed to correct its database with regard to the name of the applicant as Yogendra in place of Yogendra @ Major.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and village rivalry. It is next contended that from the joint possession of the applicant and two other accused persons a country made pistol is said to have been recovered, which false. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant was not named in the first information report and his name has came into light during the course of investigation. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.10.2020. It has been pointed out that the applicant has criminal history which has been duly explained in paragraph no.9 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application as well as in paragraph no.4 of the supplementary affidavit which on record.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Yogendra, be released on bail in Case Crime No.592 of 2020, under Sections- 392, 411 IPC, Police Station- Bisrakh, District- G.B. Nagar, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties (of Rs. Two lakhs) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 Dev/-
Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Kumar Singh Date: 2021.08.03 14:00:33 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad