Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Yoganandh vs Chinnasamy

Madras High Court|25 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
ub It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To The Principal District Munsif, Erode.
25.01.2017 CRP(PD).No.3176 of 2012 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yoganandh vs Chinnasamy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.