Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yatish And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16460 of 2019 Petitioner :- Yatish And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Vivek Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Abhijeet Mukherjee, learned AGA for the State.
Learned AGA pointed out that the learned counsel for the petitioners has neither annexed the statement of the victim recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C nor annexed the medical examination report of the victim.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition annexing the statement of the victim recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C and also the medical examination report.
The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining a photocopy of the same.
(Vivek Varma, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 13.6.2019 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yatish And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Vivek Sharma