Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yashpal vs The Of Up And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|04 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22295 of 2019 Applicant :- Yashpal Opposite Party :- The State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Kumar Gour Hari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been filed seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 29.03.2017 as well as N.B.W. order dated 17.11.2017 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Budaun in Complaint Case No.9534/ 15, Jhajhan Vs. Yashpal, under Section 379 and 504 I.P.C., Police Station Bilsi, District Budaun.
From a perusal of the complaint and the statements made in support thereof, it cannot be said that prima facie case to proceed against the applicant is not made out. It is well settled that at this stage the correctness or truthfulness of the allegations are not to be considered. What is to be seen is whether on acceptance of the allegations at the given face value a prima facie case to proceed against the accused has been made out or not. As the allegations made, which have been supported by the statement recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., do make out a prima facie case, the prayer to quash the summoning order as well as the N.B.W cannot be accepted. The prayer made to that extent is refused.
However, considering the facts of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, it is hereby provided that if the applicant appears/surrenders before the court concerned and apply for bail, within a period of six weeks from today, the bail application shall be considered in accordance with law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P.: 2004 (57) ALR 290, decided by a Full Bench of this Court, which has been approved by the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.: 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
It is also provided that no prayer for extension of the period provided herein above to surrender before the court concerned will be entertained.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.6.2019 Radhika
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yashpal vs The Of Up And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
04 June, 2019
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Sudhanshu Kumar Gour Hari