Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33670 of 2021 Applicant :- Yashpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Kumar Sharma,Amit Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bharat Singh
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicants seeking enlargement on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.168 of 2021, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B 272 IPC and section 60 A of U.P. Excise Act, police station Kotwali, district Budaun.
It is contended that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the applicant has not been arrested on the spot. The applicant has no concern with the adulterated liquor, which has been recovered from the shop as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel for the applicant has explained the criminal history of the applicant in paragraph 6 of the bail application by contending that four cases have been lodged after lodging the the present FIR and in other one case, the applicant is on bail. The applicant is in jail since 07.06.2021.
It is next submitted that co-accused Deepak Kumar @ Deepu, having similar role as that of applicant, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 24.11.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31769 of 2021, therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.
I have perused the bail order of co accused and find that the role assigned to the present applicant is almost similar to that of co accused person, who has already been enlarged on bail by this court.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposes the application for bail.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant- Yashpal, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The Trial Court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial within a period of one year after the release of the applicant.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021 Sazia