Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yashpal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32821 of 2019 Applicant :- Yashpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the only role assigned to the applicant is of catching hold the victim who was a pregnant lady whereas co-accused, Vikas is stated to have given blows by his leg on her abdomen, on account of which her child aborted and she sustained internal injuries. Therefore, the applicant may also be released on anticipatory bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submission advanced, the nature and gravity of the accusation and the fact that the applicant and his associate have acted in a most cruel manner and learned A.G.A. has stated that prosecution version is supported by the medical evidence, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicant,Yashpal involved in Case Crime No. 365 of 2019 under Sections 323, 315 and 504 I.P.C., Police Station Mawana, District Meerut.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yashpal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Sunil Kumar Tiwari