IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NOS.27858-27860 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. YAMUNA ACHARTHI, DEAD BY HER LRS 1. SMT.RAMANI DINESH ACHARYA, D/O LATE SRIDHAR ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NEAR PRIMARY AIDED SCHOOL, POST BOLA PANJARUKATTE, KARKAL TALUK – 574 104.
UDUPI DISTRICT.
2. SMT. HEMAMALINI SUDHAKAR ACHARYA, D/O LATE SRIDHAR ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, C/O A.B.SHETTY COMPOUND, OPP: OLD KENT ROAD, PO PANDESHWAR, MANGALORE, DAKSHIA KANNADA DISTRICT – 575001. (BY SRI.VIGHNESHWAR.S.SHASTRI, ADVOCATE) AND:
... PETITIONERS 1. SRI. KALIKAMBA DEVASTANA, BARKUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS 3RD TRUSTEE, SRI. A.YOGISH ACHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SON OF LATE A.SRINIVAS ACHARYA, “SRINIVAS”, ALEVOOR PO, UDUPI – 574118.
2. MADHAV ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE KOGGA @ MANJUNATH ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT - 576 210.
3. SMT. LAXMI ACHARTHI, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, W/O LATE VITTAL ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
4. MR. ANANTHA KRISHNA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SON OF LATE VITTAL ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
5. MR. SRIKANTHA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE VITTAL ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
6. MR. DINESH ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRIDHAR ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
7. MR. UMESH ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRIDHAR ACHARYA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
8. SMT. SUVARNA N.BHAT, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, ADITHI CLINIC, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
9. SURESH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, ARCHANA ELECTRICALS, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
10. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, AMRUTESHWARI LABORATORIES, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
11. SRI.VENKATESH PAI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, PRABHAT CANTEEN, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
12. SRI.VIVEK ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SUSHMA JEWELLERS, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
13. SRI.CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, CHANDANA SHAMIYANA, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
14. SRI.DAYANANDA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SUSHMA GENERAL STORES, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
15. SRI.VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, SABHYA COMMUNICATIONS, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
16. SRI RAMACHNADRA MADYASTHA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RADHA MEDICALS, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
17. SRI.CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, KARTHIK SWITCHWARE, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
18. SRI.RATNAKAR SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PADMA FINANCE, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210.
19. SRI.RAJARAM RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SADHANA FANCY, KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, BARKUR & KALLUCHAPPARA LOCALITY, BARKUR, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT – 576 210. ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.01.2019 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 TO 4 IN O.S.NO.196/2009 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC AT KUNDAPUR AS PER ANNEXURE-L.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER The order of allowing legal representative’s application, application for condonation of delay in filing the LR application and the application for setting aside the abatement cannot be a subject matter of scrutiny by the Writ Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India. However, the contentions as to title facts are kept open, for urgement in the proceedings in the Court below.
Accordingly, petitions stand dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE SB