Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yamini Bhushan Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 January, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Notice on behalf of opposite party No.1 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel, while Sri Vikrant Raghuvanshi, learned counsel has accepted notices on behalf of opposite party Nos.2 to 5 and has put in appearance on their behalf.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, while assailing the impugned orders dated 27.08.2012, 29.10.2013 and 26.10.2018 prayed that the opposite parties be directed to pay the petitioner's regular pension without deduction of any amount.
It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner retired on 30.09.2009 and the recovery has been initiated against him after his retirement without following due procedure of law.
List this petition on 31.01.2019 as fresh to enable Sri Vikrant Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for the opposite parties, to seek complete instructions in the matter.
Order Date :- 24.1.2019 Suresh/ [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yamini Bhushan Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 January, 2019
Judges
  • Rajesh Singh Chauhan