Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Yadavnath Singh Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41498 of 2019 Petitioner :- Yadavnath Singh Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Pratap Singh,Vivek Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The petitioners basically want that the illegal encroachment of the private respondents 6 -9 be directed to be removed as it has obstructed the passage of the petitioners.
The dispute as raised by the petitioners is within the private domain, for which purpose, the writ petition is not maintainable.
In case, any obstruction has been caused in the right of way of the petitioners, the remedy available to them is by way of a civil suit or by action under Section 133 Cr.P.C.
The writ petition, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yadavnath Singh Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Pratap Singh Vivek Pandey