IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NOS.24212-24214/2018(C) BETWEEN:
1.Wunderbar Films Pvt. Ltd. Having its registered office at 4th Floor, Door No.13/6, Jaganathan Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600034 Reptd. by its authorised signatory Mr. E.Akbar Ali.
2. Mr.Dhanush K, S/o Mr.Kasthooriraja, 34 years, R/at 76/31, Venkateshwara Building, 9th Floor, Chamiers Road, Chennai -600028, Reptd. by his GPA Holder Mr.E.Akbar Ali.
3. Ms. Aishwarya, D/o Rajnikanth, 34 years, Residing at 76/31, Venkateshwara Building, 9th Floor, Chamiers Road, Chennai -600028, Reptd. by his GPA Holder Mr.E.Akbar Ali. …Petitioners.
AND:
1.The State of Karnataka, Reptd. by its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore – 560 001.
2. The State of Karnataka, Home Department, Vidhana Soudha, Vidhana Veedhi, Bangalore – 560 001.
Reptd. by its Principal Secretary.
3. The Director General and Inspector General of Police, State of Karnataka, Nrupathunga Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
4. The Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru City, Infantry Road, Bengaluru -560 001.
5. Central Board of Film Certification, Films Division Complex, Phase-1 Building, 9th Floor, Dr.G.Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai -400026.
Reptd. by its Chief Executive Officer, 6. The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, 1st Main, Crescent Road, High Grounds, Bengaluru -560 001. Reptd. by its President.
(By Smt. B.P.Radha, AGA for R1 to R4, …Respondents.
Shri. Shanmukhappa, Adv. for R6, R5 – served) These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to restrain the respondent No.1 from taking any measures that would in any manner restrain/restrict the exhibition of the petitioners’ film “KAALA” in all languages.
These petitions coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the following;
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners’ has filed a memo and seeks leave of this Court to with draw these petitions.
2. In view of the memo, petitioners are permitted to withdraw these petitions.
3. Petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Msu