Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

W.P.No.455 Of 2012 vs The Chief Engineer

Madras High Court|17 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Both the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents submitted that the impugned orders passed by the first respondent blacklisting the petitioner for a period of 3 years from the date of issue of Notice dated 26.12.2011 had come to an end. Subsequently, the respondents have issued work order to the petitioner.
2. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsels, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. As such, there is no bar for the petitioner to participate in the future tenders which are floated by the Government Departments. The said fact is also not disputed by both the parties.
3. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
17.02.2017 Index : Yes / no Internet: yes /no asvm To
1.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Central Office, 34, Lal Bahadur Shastri Street, Puducherry  605 001.
2.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Yanam Division, Puducherry  533 464.
3.The Director General of Works, Central Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi  110 011.
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J (asvm) W.P.No.455 of 2012 and M.P.No.2 of 2012 17.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

W.P.No.455 Of 2012 vs The Chief Engineer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
17 February, 2017